<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Proton Proton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.supmag.com/2006/proton-proton-rules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.supmag.com/2006/proton-proton-rules/</link>
	<description>Based in London &#38; New York City, we strive to bring you the best in new and classic music without that nasty hipster aftertaste.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:04:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: heidi</title>
		<link>http://www.supmag.com/2006/proton-proton-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>heidi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 01:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supmag.com/?p=257#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Here is a good interview:
Q: What&#039;s the best thing about music journalism today and the worst thing?
Ben: The best thing is what&#039;s always been true: music journalism is a flexible form and wide open. You&#039;re not expected to have been to journalism school, or have a music degree; you can use a discussion of a record or a concert as a jumping-off place for talking about society and history and geography.
I can think of a few bad things. One is an alarming trend in arts journalism I&#039;ve heard about, where newspaper critics are being asked to write about concerts as they happen, in a live feed to the paper&#039;s website. Another is unmerited confessional rock criticism: people are getting &quot;new journalism&quot; confused with perversely dull personal nosepicking.
-- Ben Ratliff
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a good interview:<br />
Q: What&#8217;s the best thing about music journalism today and the worst thing?<br />
Ben: The best thing is what&#8217;s always been true: music journalism is a flexible form and wide open. You&#8217;re not expected to have been to journalism school, or have a music degree; you can use a discussion of a record or a concert as a jumping-off place for talking about society and history and geography.<br />
I can think of a few bad things. One is an alarming trend in arts journalism I&#8217;ve heard about, where newspaper critics are being asked to write about concerts as they happen, in a live feed to the paper&#8217;s website. Another is unmerited confessional rock criticism: people are getting &#8220;new journalism&#8221; confused with perversely dull personal nosepicking.<br />
&#8211; Ben Ratliff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
